Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Disruptive Technology

12 comments:

KAD said...

Where is the post?? Or was it "disrupted"??

Unknown said...

Welcome welcome .. The Dark Lord awaits.. He was telling me he particularly like your choice of blood red over black.

NN said...

@Kanishka: I'm not going to talk about technology. i hate technology.this is a technology slide so we'll skip it. no no no to technology..yadyadayada

@666: i do not come to see the Dark Lord. My darklord resides within.

@Lost Soul: Good question. Bad answer.

Aran said...

Oh man. It's like I entered hell. What happened here?

Are you going to write angst-filled and depressed things now? :p

Quirkilicious said...

Disruptive technology...or disruptive you??

NN said...

@aran: never planned anything, this is no exception.

@aditi: Girl, dirupted.

Aran said...

FWIW, I kind of like it.

Rohit Kumar said...

A look at Nani ki kahani
Only confirms my intuition about gender bias !

Look at the number of hits and response you get :-O

Why why !!! Unfair world or usual response to a feminine charm !
Either way, unfair to me :-))

NN said...

@Aran: err..what ij FWIW?

@Roji: Are u saying my blog doesnt deserve the trafic?!! @#$%@# :D

Rohit Kumar said...

:-)) Cool boss.

Itna deep thinking mode me brain ko not be processing.

I am saying the response to all deserving things isnt evenly distributed due to other influences like gender !

:-))

Actually, i can do an experiment with it. Create 2 profile. 1 male and 1 female. Write the same stuff on both's blogs and publicize by same means (Orkut). And then we ll see :-P

NN said...

Wah kya idea hai Roji!!!

Waise toh this post is not just a stunt. it is also part of an experiment to prove one of my theories. The theory yeh hai ki smaller the post more the comments. in mathematical terms the number of comments per post is inversely related to the number of words in the post :D
Whaddya think ?

Rohit Kumar said...

Well broadly speaking, your "hypothesis" has some ground now dude.

But, i would say this experiment was highly skewed to support the hypothesis. :-))

I think a better hypothesis would be

A. Responses are directly propotional to relevance of your post to you

B. But, relevance of your post to you is "often" inversely related to the number of words you write i.e. if you write a lot, chances are, you are bullshitting :-))